ELASTIC REALITY OSCAR SOFTWARE
Not really that big of a deal but it requires you to jump into some 3D software and create the geometry, rig it so it s deformable, track the original footage in 3D, animate the lashes, and render it and then comp it back in.īy the way, if you are interested in hiring me to do this kind of work just let me know. That looked like actual 3D geometry that had to be tracked to the movement of the eye lids. Probably the most difficult part was the eyelash enhancement. As new things come into view, the old things go out of view. This is basically just like if you had a retouch job and had to work on about 10 or so RAW images. When you do this kind of stuff for a living you basically look at shots like this: How many times she turns around or drastically changes perspective is how many times you are going to have to repaint and retouch the subject. Notice to that the subjects aren't moving around a lot. So the process here is really not that difficult. You basically create a bunch of retouched "patches" that then get tracked in 3D to the persons face. But keep in mind that because of planer tracking, this is no longer a frame by frame painting process. You just need a really fast machine, a s**ton of RAM and patients. And you are wrong about the film industry not doing this in 4K.
ELASTIC REALITY OSCAR HOW TO
In fact, here is a tutorial on how to do it in Mocha:Īnd the fact that it's 4K doesn't have as big an impact as you are making it out to be. This is most surely just a lot of Planer tracking in Mocha or mostly likely Nuke. Octoat 12:43PM, Edited September 4, 7:54AMĮxactly! I work in the VFX industry and I can tell you this is not new. I really didn't understand your comparison to energy drinks and blood transfusions. Taking out a pimple isn't the same as making someone impossible thin or making someone look ten years younger. Like I said, this is especially true if highlighting the person on camera is the point of the video (the artist in music videos, brides in wedding videos, etc.) If asked, they almost always want pimples cleaned up, etc. I'm not sure what your experience has been, but in my experience the talent usually wants slight blemishes taken out (if possible). Retouching has always been done in visual media, even since before photography. Just because the misuse of a tool is unethical does not make the tool itself unethical. But slight touch-ups and the stuff we see in magazine ads are two completely different things. When it is done excessively, yeah, I agree that it becomes disgusting and unethical. What do you guys think? If the technology needs the extra pixels, does this make the case for 4K video? Have you done any retouching like this in your own work?Īgain, like the guy I replied to, you are jumping to the extreme. Can you do something like this in After Effects? Probably, but the amount of detail that is retained after retouching is impressive, and the retouches are blended seamlessly in a pretty impressive way. It's likely the tracker will have a difficult time if the scene changes drastically, but since we don't have any examples of that, we can't be sure. The real test for this sort of thing will be to see it with a lot of motion. It also seems that the technology they have can be made to work with lower resolutions, but I'm sure they have a custom tracker that works a lot better when there is more information and more detail.
You might be thinking that this isn't all impressive or that they do this all the time on movies, but most effects are not done at 4K, as the cost is just too great. The other videos don't seem to be embeddable at the moment, but you can check out the rest on Foton's Vimeo page.